It used to be your lower-body couldn’t be shown shaking on camera. Now it may be the only thing shown. I don’t suggest we turn back the clock to the 1950s, but we’ve lost the middle ground between family values and personal pleasure.
YouTube shouldn’t remove s*xually-provocative videos, but it should age-restrict them in order to protect the minds (and values) of children and young adults.
When a video is age-restricted a user has to sign in and agree they are 18+ and the video won’t be featured on the Trending page or recommended as much to viewers.
I’m a social moderate, but since social media / mainstream media / blockbuster films are controlled by social progressives it makes my reasonable positions sound like I’m some nutty honey-grab-my-bible-and-gun-we-got-some-work-to-do zealot.
(constant pressure social media, liberal media affecting youth)
Here are the lyrics to the above song (not to be confused with Elvis). You tell me if I’m being unreasonable:
No, she ain't get no DM from me (b*tch)
This rich n*gga d*ck, it ain't free
She be throwin' that a*s, yeah, she good at it
Turn around when we f*ck, make her look at it (uh, she like, hah)
85 million views with a large segment coming from the under 18 demographic.
The thing I really want parents and young adults to consider is that YOUR LIKES ARE NOT YOUR LIKES.
(constant pressure social media, liberal media affecting youth)
Yes, there is some biological basis in our preferences, but if you grab a microscope and inspect the DNA of a 16-year-old girl you will not find a handstand-twerking-gene nor will you find in the DNA of a 16-year-old boy a throw-money-at-that-hoe gene.
I had written a detailed explanation for what influences “likes”, which got taken down by Quora under BNBR so you can watch it here if you’d like.
But isn’t it interesting how social media is more afraid of moderate conservative viewpoints than they are of consistently feeding young people a narrative of, “you are not popular enough, pretty enough, sexual enough”?
Conservative values threaten those with power because it means they’ll be held to a higher standard: don’t lie, cheat, steal.
If those with power can convince you it’s okay to sometimes lie, cheat, and steal then that gives them free rein to do whatever they want with whomever they want so long as they can convince their target that they like to be used like a disposable paper cup, which isn’t particularly hard to do when you have money and fame in a money-fame driven world.
Who benefits the most from the breakdown of the family? It’s the top 1% alpha males who can now sleep with a larger segment of the population without any of the pesky cultural stigmas that used to be associated with breaking up a family, sleeping with multiple girls a third your age, cheating on your spouse, etc. Freedom! One life! YOLO!
And as YouTube pushes sexual promiscuity onto children, they are also removing non-mainstream political speech from their platform because I suppose YouTube recognizes their content’s influence on human behavior when it’s convenient for their agenda.
YouTube’s oligarchic message: your body is to be used, not your mind.
0 Comments